**We are currently inviting lawyers and law students to add their names to this letter, which was sent on February 7, 2024 to every Member of Parliament and Senator, and which included a link to this website for updated endorsements. If you wish to add your name, please email us.**

LAWYERS’ open letter to parliament

a call to affirm the equality and dignity of every life

 
Canadians with mental illness deserve the most accessible and effective life-affirming supports, not a suggestion that the solution to their suffering is to terminate their lives. Any legislative adoption of such a message would be profoundly harmful, and inherently ableist.
 

Dear Members of Parliament and Senators:

We, the undersigned lawyers, law students, and academics, write to urge you to permanently halt the planned expansion of MAID for mental illness in Canada.  

We commend and thank the government for listening to the concerns of medical, legal, and disability experts in concluding that a state-sponsored, medically-administered death should not be offered in Canada as a “solution” to mental illness at this time. However, the issue goes beyond Canadian healthcare’s preparedness or whether it could ever be “ready” to offer MAID for mental illness, in that such a practice is intrinsically harmful and discriminatory, and should never be entrenched in Canadian law.

Canadians with mental illness deserve the most accessible and effective life-affirming supports, not a suggestion that the solution to their suffering is to terminate their lives. Any legislative adoption of such a message would be profoundly harmful, and inherently ableist.

We do not suggest that those seeking to legalize MAID for mental illness intend to send such a message, but unintentional discrimination is still discrimination, and any Charter analysis will ultimately be concerned with the effects, not just the motives, of the law.

Here, the law’s effect is to treat Canadians with certain mental and physical disabilities differently than everyone else. Canadians who are not disabled are guaranteed, without exception, the absolute protection of the law from a premature death, and an unremitting societal commitment to end any suffering they may experience, but never their lives. However, Canadians with physical and mental disabilities – those with a “grievous and irremediable medical condition” – do not enjoy the same, unequivocal protections. Instead, these Canadians are told that an appropriate terminus of their suffering – and theirs only – might be a state-sponsored, medically-initiated death.

We therefore share and echo the concerns that have been raised by legal scholars, health care professionals, the disability community, and human rights experts – concerns that apply not just to MAID for mental illness, but to any form of disability-related termination of life (i.e. “track two MAID”).

Some have suggested that Parliament has no other choice but to expand MAID for mental illness because it has been mandated by the courts, and is a constitutional right. However, as detailed in a letter by over 30 law professors, in a peer-reviewed law journal, in legal submissions to the AMAD committee, and by representatives of the Department of Justice, this is not accurate.

No Canadian court has adjudicated this issue, let alone ruled that Parliament must legalize state-sponsored death for mental disorders and that the provinces must subsequently offer it through their respective healthcare systems. Neither Carter nor Truchon involved plaintiffs with a psychiatric condition. In Carter, the Supreme Court expressly stated that “euthanasia for minors or persons with psychiatric disorders” would “not fall within the parameters suggested in these reasons” (para. 111). And while the Alberta Court of Appeal in EF opined that psychiatric conditions were not necessarily excluded from the scope of Carter’s declaration, that was not a Charter challenge and did not involve any new constitutional analysis.

Even if courts had opined on the matter, however, Parliament would still have the constitutional prerogative to wrestle with the pertinent evidence, human rights concerns, and complex policy considerations. Parliament ultimately retains the responsibility to craft a complex regulatory regime – one guided by the courts’ rulings, but which need not “slavishly conform” to them. As the Supreme Court of Canada itself affirmed:

 “[It] does not follow from the fact that a law passed by Parliament differs from a regime envisaged by the Court in the absence of a statutory scheme, that Parliament’s law is unconstitutional.  Parliament may build on the Court’s decision, and develop a different scheme as long as it remains constitutional.  Just as Parliament must respect the Court’s rulings, so the Court must respect Parliament’s determination that the judicial scheme can be improved.  To insist on slavish conformity would belie the mutual respect that underpins the relationship between the courts and legislature that is so essential to our constitutional democracy.” (R v. Mills, para. 55, emphasis added)

Of course, courts may then have the opportunity to re-assess the constitutionality of legislation, but the point is this: rather than basing life-and-death decisions on speculative claims about how a court might rule, Parliament has the moral and constitutional responsibility to itself assess the evidence and determine which legal protections are reasonable, necessary, and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Parliament has a role – indeed a duty – to reach its own conclusions on the Charter.

In this context, the government must take notice that many specialists and clinicians have consistently stated that, when it comes to mental illness, they can not determine with reasonable confidence whether an individual case is irremediable. They have noted the absence of “evidence from anywhere in the world that supports being able to identify irremediability in individual cases of mental illness” (p. 12).

This lack of medical consensus, among other concerns, led Québec’s Select Committee to recommend “that access to medical aid in dying not be extended to persons whose only medical condition is a mental disorder” – a recommendation adopted by the National Assembly and now reflected in Québec’s Act respecting end of life care (s. 26). Indeed, how can the law endorse the irrevocable termination of life as a “permanent solution” to what can never be ruled out as a treatable condition?

Parliament must also consider specific concerns unique to the mental health context, including the fact that, in some cases, a person’s “desire to die could be a symptom of their condition” (p. 68), as could their perception of intolerable suffering – suffering which could potentially “be addressed clinically despite their view that it is irremediable” (p. 79).

Ultimately, a premature death should never be promoted as a medical “solution” to all kinds of suffering, and certainly not as a more accessible solution than life-affirming treatment and support.  We are concerned that Canada’s current MAID regime is already failing in this regard. We therefore reiterate the concerns previously raised by 147 member organizations and allies of the disability rights community, and call on the government to not only permanently cancel the planned expansion of MAID for mental illness, but also to take the necessary steps to repeal Bill C-7’s expansion of MAID for Canadians with disabilities who are not dying or near death (an expansion based on the Truchon trial decision, which was not appealed, nor reviewed by a higher court).

In its place, we urge the government to prioritize mental health and disability supports that respect everyone’s fundamental right to medical assistance in living.

Thank you for your consideration of these concerns. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss these matters with you further, or provide any other assistance you may find helpful.

Sincerely,

Derek Ross, LL.B., LL.M., CLF Executive Director & General Counsel

André M. Schutten, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., CLF Senior Counsel

Vivian Clemence, JD, CLF Bilingual Counsel

Endorsed by:

  1. Jonathan Kulathungam, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  2. Shawn M. Smith, B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, White Rock, B.C.

  3. Marie-Louise Fast, B.A., LLB., Barrister & Solicitor, Burnaby, BC

  4. Renée E. Short, LLB, Lawyer, Airdrie, AB

  5. Andrea Sim, BCL/JD, Articling Student, Ottawa, ON  

  6. Ruth A.M. Ross, B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, London, ON 

  7. Winston Sayson, KC, MGC, Retired Lawyer, Richmond, BC

  8. Sarah Russell, J.D., Lawyer, Halifax, NS

  9. Andrea Dickinson, CPA, CA, LL.B., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  10. Timothy Stonhouse - retired member of Alberta & B.C. Bars

  11. John Sikkema, Lawyer, Ottawa, ON

  12. Jad Debs, MA, JD, Lawyer, Ottawa, ON

  13. Barry W. Bussey, B.A., LL.B., M.A., LL.M., M.P.A.C.S., PhD., Lawyer, Peterborough, ON

  14. Ian Carruthers, BMus, MMus, JD, Lawyer, Cochrane, AB

  15. Sheldon L. Wood B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, London, ON

  16. Alan Honner, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  17. Geoffrey Trotter, BA, LLB, Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  18. Don Hutchinson, B.A., J.D., D.Min., Lawyer, Ottawa, ON

  19. Bruce Bos, Lawyer, Ontario

  20. Vicky Chan, J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  21. Nancy A. Bergstrom, LLB, Lawyer, Red Deer, AB

  22. Robert E. Reynolds, Lawyer, Montreal, QC

  23. Peter J. Anderson, JD, Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  24. Daniel Moholia, B.A., J.D., Toronto, ON

  25. Richard M. Harding, Bar. & Sol. (retired)

  26. Vivian James LLB, Lawyer, Oakville, ON

  27. Reagan F. King, J.D., Lawyer, Moose Jaw, SK

  28. Earl Phillips, K.C., Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  29. Philip J. Dougan, B.A., LL.B. Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  30. Stanley G. Mayes, Retired Lawyer, Oshawa, ON

  31. Jeremy Bieman, BBA, LLB, Lawyer/Avocat, Montréal, QC

  32. Craig A. Lewis, Lawyer, Mississauga, ON

  33. Luke A. Schwanke B.A., LL.B, Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  34. Jerald Mackenzie, L.L.B., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  35. David W. McMath, B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, Island View, NB

  36. Valerie Dye, LLB, LLM, PhD., Lawyer, Ontario

  37. Brenda Stokes Verworn B.A, J.D., M.A, (Retired Lawyer), Thorold, ON

  38. Marty Moore, JD, Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  39. James A. Russell, Lawyer, Halifax, NS

  40. Kevin Marshall, B.A., M.Div., LL.B., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  41. Janice Pasay, BCom, LLB, Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  42. Kenneth Koprowski Lawyer/Deputy Judge, Retired

  43. Luke Johnson, LL.B., Lawyer, Delta, British Columbia

  44. Kathleen Rose Kennedy Chevalier, LLB, Lawyer, Montréal, QC

  45. Raylene Kloihofer, JD, Lawyer, Olds, AB

  46. Terrance S. Carter, B.A., LL.B., Orangeville, ON

  47. Carla M. Dombowsky, B.A., B.C.L., LL.B., Prince Albert, Saskatchewan

  48. Andrea Leung, J.D., Articling Student, Kitchener, ON

  49. Edward Choi, JD, LLM, LLB, BBA, BEd, Barrister & Solicitor, Markham, ON

  50. Stephen Penney, J.D., Lawyer, Cambridge, ON

  51. Philip Watts B.A., J.D., LL.M, Lawyer, Winnipeg, MB

  52. Lee C. Turner, LL.B, Lawyer, Kelowna, B.C.

  53. Waldy Derksen, lawyer, Winnipeg, Manitoba

  54. Stephan Ruzic, J.D. Candidate, Peter A. Allard School of Law, Vancouver, BC

  55. Michael Menear, Lawyer, London, ON

  56. John Lockhart, JD, Lawyer, Mississauga, ON

  57. Gerald Kent, LLB, LLM, retired lawyer, Cranbrook, B.C.

  58. Tyler Koverko, J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  59. Chris Markou, LL.B, B.A. (Hons), TEP, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  60. Connor Giesbrecht, Law Student, Winnipeg, MB

  61. Jon Stolee, B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, Camrose, AB

  62. Darren L. Richards, B.Sc., LLB, Lawyer, Edmonton, AB

  63. Rhys Volkenant, J.D., Lawyer, Surrey, BC

  64. Tiffani Frederick, JD, LL.B., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  65. Darren Leung, J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  66. Terry Prockiw, Lawyer, Two Hills, AB

  67. Tina Wang, J.D., Lawyer, Surrey, B.C.

  68. Philip E. Carr, BA, LLB, Retired Lawyer, Calgary AB

  69. Nancy Toran Harbin, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto, ON

  70. Kim Wong, LL.B., Richmond Hill, ON

  71. Sandra Walters, B.A., J.D., retired lawyer, Scotch Creek, B.C.

  72. Kaleb Beauchesne, Law Student, Prince Albert, SK

  73. Walter W. Kubitz KC, Barrister and Solicitor, Calgary, AB

  74. Michelle Nguyen, Student-at-law, Calgary, AB

  75. K.R. Davidson, LL.B, MBA, Lawyer, St. Catharines, ON

  76. Monika Hanna, LL.B., Lawyer, Vaughan, ON

  77. Kenneth H. Volkenant, Barrister & Solicitor, Surrey, BC

  78. Christa C. Wessel, BA, LLB, C.Dir, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  79. Constance Mensah Abebreseh, Hons. BA, JD, Barrister & Solicitor, Bowmanville, ON

  80. Teagan Lee, Law Student, Fredericton, NB

  81. Evelyn Lee, JD, Articling Student, Toronto, ON

  82. Brayden Volkenant, J.D., Lawyer, Surrey, BC

  83. Paul D. Mack, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Lawyer, Oshawa, ON

  84. Frank Molnar, KC, Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  85. Daniel Neven, Law Student, Ottawa, ON

  86. Joshua S. Fortier, LLB, Lawyer, Edmonton, AB

  87. Taras Kulish, BCL, LL.B, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  88. Garifalia Milousis, BSocsSc, JD, Lawyer, Ottawa, ON

  89. Brian Bird, Lecturer, Peter A. Allard School of Law, UBC

  90. Christopher Taucar, PhD, LL.M., B.A., LL.B., of the Bars of Ontario and British Columbia

  91. Onyinye Chukwunyerenwa, Lawyer, Alberta

  92. Timothy McCabe, LL.B., Q.C., Retired Lawyer, Mississauga, ON

  93. Daniel N. Tangjerd, B.A., LLB, Lawyer, Saskatoon, SK

  94. Nicholas A. Koltun, J.D., Lawyer, Swift Current, SK

  95. Sarah Hanna, B.Sc., LL.B., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  96. Peter Trieu, Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  97. Roger Song, LL.B., LL.M. (China); LL.M. (US); J.D., Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  98. Peter Luttmann, MA, JD, Retired Lawyer, Melvern Square, NS

  99. Teresa Douma, LL.B., Lawyer, Ayr, ON

  100. David Gileff, Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  101. Shannon R. Dinh, BA, LL.B, Lawyer, London, ON

  102. Benjamin J. Ferland, JD, Edmonton, AB

  103. Wenjun Ruan, JD, Toronto, Ontario

  104. Harry D. Thompson, QC, Halifax, NS

  105. Stanley W.H. Leo, J.D., Lawyer, Coquitlam, BC

  106. Brian Clarke, BCom, LLB, non-practising member of the Law Society of Manitoba

  107. Eric Vandergriendt, Lawyer, Surrey, BC

  108. Olohirere Musa, J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  109. Ryan Mills, B.A., J.D., LL.M, Lawyer Burlington, ON

  110. Jeannette Savoie, L.L.B., L.L.M., Lawyer, Fredericton, NB

  111. Kristoffer Diocampo, J.D., Lawyer, Etobicoke, ON

  112. Evelyne Akoto, JD, LL.L., LL.M., Montreal, PQ

  113. Valerie On, JD, Lawyer, Ontario

  114. Karen E. MacDonald, B.A., LL.B, Lawyer, London, Ontario

  115. Stella Iriah, LL.B., LL.M., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  116. Ethan Fisher, B.Comm., Law Student, Saskatoon, SK 

  117. Robert D. Onley, JD, Lawyer, Toronto, Ontario

  118. Randy Schliemann, B.Sc. (Hons.), J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  119. Cecilia A. Devonish, Lawyer, London, ON

  120. Princess Okechukwu, LL.B, LL.M, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  121. Jessica Toth, Law Student, Ottawa, ON

  122. Sammy Lee, LL.B., M. Soc. Sci., Barrister & Solicitor, Markham, ON

  123. Moyosore Somide, B.L., LL.B., LLM, Lawyer, London, ON

  124. Catherine Dyck, J.D., Lawyer, London, ON

  125. Mike Jehu, J.D., Student-at-Law, Toronto, ON

  126. Mina Athanasius, LL.B., Lawyer/Minister's Counsel, Vaughan, ON

  127. J. Allen Howard, B.A., LL.B., Retired, Calgary, Alberta

  128. Oloff Biermann, Lawyer, Langley, BC

  129. Brian K. Lau, B.Sc (Pharm), JD, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  130. Faith Paul, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), LL.M., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  131. Samuel Teunissen, J.D., Lawyer, Edmonton, AB

  132. Kristin Debs, LLB, Lawyer, Ottawa, ON

  133. Tersha De Koning, J.D., Lawyer and LLM student, Toronto, ON

  134. Stephen Wishart, B.C.L., L.L.B., Lawyer, Member of the Ontario and Quebec Bars

  135. George Gunnink, Lawyer, Surrey, BC

  136. Kristopher Kinsinger, BA, JD, LLM, Lawyer, Cambridge, ON

  137. Rhoda Cookhorn, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  138. Hendrik Venter, Lawyer, Ottawa ON

  139. Matthew Kaup, J.D., Lawyer, St. Albert, AB

  140. Connie Do, Lawyer, Vancouver BC

  141. Daniel C. Santoro, Barrister & Solicitor, Ontario

  142. Jonathon Obara, Law Student, Toronto, ON

  143. David MacPhail, Retired Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  144. Sumeeta Chaudhari, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto, ON

  145. Aidan Perreault, M.A., J.D. Candidate, Vancouver, BC

  146. Kyle Morgan, Barrister & Solicitor, Manitoba

  147. Catherine Kim, Law Student, UBC

  148. Eleni Dick, J.D., Lawyer, Winnipeg, MB

  149. Ogo E. Ebubechukwu, LL.M, CIPP/C, Lawyer, Winnipeg, MB

  150. Noah Mossey, Law Student, Vancouver, BC

  151. Allison Kindle Pejovic, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Lawyer, Calgary, AB

  152. Anisha Dinah Nicola Chaudhari, LLB, LLM, Student-at-Law, Toronto, ON

  153. George Egerton, PhD, Associate Professor of History, UBC, Emeritus

  154. Luke Van Bostelen, BA, Law Student, Edmonton, AB

  155. David Dueck, M.A., J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  156. Donald L. Wilkinson, B.A., B. Comm. Hons., M.A., J.D., Lawyer, Kelowna, British Columbia

  157. Sienne Lau, J.D., Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  158. Simone Waller, J.D., Lawyer, Niagara Falls, ON

  159. Dawson McKay, Lawyer, BC

  160. Luke J. Effa, J.D., Lawyer, Lake Country, B.C.

  161. Robert Evans, LL.B. MB 1978, Edmonton, AB

  162. Coralei R. Still, BScN, JD, Lawyer, Langley, BC

  163. Bayley Wachsmuth, J.D. Candidate, Calgary, AB

  164. Benjamin Hiebert, B.A., J.D. Oakville, ON

  165. Eric Flowers, B.A., M.P.A., Law Student, Toronto, ON

  166. Petar Bratic, B.Comm, Law Student, London, ON

  167. Ethan Gilhula, Law Student, London, ON

  168. Haneen Bishara, Law Student, London, ON

  169. Shirley Barton, Law Student, Edmonton, AB

  170. Danny Yeo, JD, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  171. David Manukian, Law Student, London, ON

  172. Devin R. S. Drover, B.Sc, JD, MBA, Lawyer, St. John’s, NL

  173. Linda G. Yang, Lawyer, Vancouver, BC

  174. Raphael T. R. Fernandes, JD, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  175. Danny Gurizzan, Lawyer, Vaughan, ON

  176. Deborah Santema Olthof, B.A., LL.B., Lawyer, Leduc, AB

  177. Jason Poettcker, Lawyer,  J.D, M.A., B.A., Winnipeg, MB

  178. Kelicia Letlow-Peroune, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  179. Denis Grigoras, Lawyer, Toronto, ON

  180. Jeremiah Quinn Clement-Schlimm, Lawyer, Vaughan, ON